From: John Kim (jokim_at_CHS.CUSD.CLAREMONT.EDU)
Date: Mon Dec 20 1993 - 21:49:10 EST
In message Sun, 19 Dec 1993 16:29:22 -0600 (CST),
Sean Chou <ychou_at_uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> writes:
> I personally think that the AT&T is the best modem but the MHz has gotten
> good reviews (primarily due to it's XJack though). It would be a personal
> issue as to whether or not it's worth losing money over this (my friend
> got a Smart Modular Tech modem for more than an AT&T and has been trying
> to sell his SMT modem since but can't find anyone willing to pay over
> $175 for it which would mean $150 loss).
The MegaHertz V.32bis modem currently only emulates a 16450. The AT&T
emulates a 16550 (AFNANDWHATEVEROTHERLETTERS). MegaHertz says they're
working on a version that emulates a 16550.
-- John H. Kim | "In fact, Chicago does support security. The sec- jokim_at_jarthur.cs.hmc.edu | urity APIs are there; they just don't do anything." This mail sent by NUPop | - Brad Silverber, VP Microsoft personal systems
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:52:16 EST