Re: Should we try for a newsgroup?

From: Arie Litman (litman_at_netcom.com)
Date: Fri Jul 22 1994 - 13:53:04 EDT

• Next message: Kendall Chenoweth: "Re: IBM Gopher and FTP sites!"
• Previous message: Kendall Chenoweth: "Re: IBM Gopher and FTP sites!"
• In reply to: chan4_at_husc.harvard.edu: "Re: Should we try for a newsgroup?"
• Next in thread: Keith Moore: "Re: Should we try for a newsgroup?"
• Reply: Keith Moore: "Re: Should we try for a newsgroup?"

Please! let convert this list to a newsgroup... my mail is full as it is....
Newsgroups are more accesible, and more convenient...

Arie Litman
voice (408)441-1166 x4411
FAX x**4411 Litman_at_netcom.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 22 Jul 1994 chan4_at_husc.harvard.edu wrote:

> Hmmm...sure I think we should create a newsgroup. This would also allow
> people to have killfiles for subjects that don't interest them.
> Hmmm...I'd offer to start the ball rolling, but I'm not sure how to do
> this at all.
>
>

• Next message: Kendall Chenoweth: "Re: IBM Gopher and FTP sites!"
• Previous message: Kendall Chenoweth: "Re: IBM Gopher and FTP sites!"
• In reply to: chan4_at_husc.harvard.edu: "Re: Should we try for a newsgroup?"
• Next in thread: Keith Moore: "Re: Should we try for a newsgroup?"
• Reply: Keith Moore: "Re: Should we try for a newsgroup?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:52:24 EST