From: Dunaway_Wesley/furman_at_furman.edu
Date: Tue Apr 18 1995 - 10:22:39 EDT
Item Subject: Message text
>>Your performance numbers are not that
>>much of a suprise given that you ran
>>OS/2 on a stacked FAT partition.
I *have* run it on a stacked FAT partition. This I found to be too
slow to tolerate. Recently, I have been running, like you, with a
complete HPFS system.
Without compression, though, it's been hard to find disk space on my
little 170MB hard drive.
>>I run OS/2
>>on my thinkpad and have set it up with an HPFS
>>partition. Performance if VERY much faster than
>>running under FAT.
I agree.
Wesley Dunaway
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:52:35 EST