From: Steve Hultquist (ssh_at_wwsi.com)
Date: Wed Sep 04 1996 - 22:38:29 EDT
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark M Ingerman <ingerman_at_chelsea.ios.com> writes:
Mark> With the recent announcement of NT 4.0 availability, I am pondering
Mark> installing NT 4.0 on my thinkpad ( certain applications I need won't run
Mark> under Win95 ). The only problem is that Microsoft seems to be back
Mark> peddleing on that availability of the notebook power support and the
Mark> plug and play support.
There is no plug and play or APM in NT 4.0 (I'm running it as one of the two
OSs on my CX right now). There doesn't seem to be any NT 4.0 support for
Thinkpads, yet, either, and I don't know if the current NT utilities will run
under 4.0. Be forewarned that it takes more memory than 95, but it's also more
stable.
Mark> Looks like Microsoft has done it again. I am caught between a rock and
Mark> a hard place. Any input would be appreciated. After all, I may be
Mark> missinterpreting the trade rags. I would be interested in hearing some
Mark> pros and cons on Win95 vs. NT 4.0 for Thinkpads.
Run Linux (the other OS I run on my CX)?
ssh
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:16 EST