RE: WTB: 560 133mhz 1gm Active Matrix, 8mb

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

From: David Fox (fox_at_graphics.cs.nyu.edu)
Date: Fri Sep 06 1996 - 21:46:20 EDT

Next message: Randy Whittle: "Re: 560 120mhz 800mb vs. DEC Ultra II 133mhz 1.3gb"
Previous message: Dan Lam: "701C upgrade?"
In reply to: Mark Rees: "RE: WTB: 560 133mhz 1gm Active Matrix, 8mb"
Next in thread: Randy Whittle: "RE: WTB: 560 133mhz 1gm Active Matrix, 8mb"

In article <01BB9A96.361CCE50_at_user-168-121-167-214.dialup.mindspring.com> Mark Rees <markrees_at_mindspring.com> writes:

] Are these machines upgradable? I.e. if the performance SUCKS can I
] later replace the processor?

I'll step out on a limb here and say "no".

-- 
David Fox	   http://found.cs.nyu.edu/fox		xoF divaD
NYU Media Research Lab   fox_at_cs.nyu.edu    baL hcraeseR aideM UYN

Next message: Randy Whittle: "Re: 560 120mhz 800mb vs. DEC Ultra II 133mhz 1.3gb"
Previous message: Dan Lam: "701C upgrade?"
In reply to: Mark Rees: "RE: WTB: 560 133mhz 1gm Active Matrix, 8mb"
Next in thread: Randy Whittle: "RE: WTB: 560 133mhz 1gm Active Matrix, 8mb"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:16 EST