Re: IRQ's TP701c

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Christian Carey (ccarey_at_CapAccess.org)
Date: Mon Oct 21 1996 - 11:45:31 EDT


On Monday, 21st October 1996, Maurice klein Gebbinck wrote:

> Yesterday I finally succeeded in establishing a Direct Cable
> Connection between my ThinkPad 701C and a friend's desktop.
> I spent several hours on this relatively simple task because of an
> IRQ-conflict between LPT1 and the Audio System. After changing the
> IRQ for the Audio System from IRQ 7 to IRQ 10, as described in
> ftp://204.146.167.81/pub/pccbbs/corrective_service/wn95701.txt,
> the DCC worked smoothly. However, I lost the sound effects
> of Doom2. The configuration program of Doom2 said that the IRQ
> for the Audio System should not be higher than 9. Has anyone
> encountered this problem before, and if so, could you e-mail me
> your IRQ settings please?

What I've done on my 701C is to keep the audio at 7; change the
MultiPort II parallel to 7; and change the diskette/parallel to 5.
This allows audio applications to coexist with parallel transfers
without requiring the MultiPort II to be attached.

> In the system section of the control panel I saw that there
> existed some more IRQ-conflicts. Although they didn't bother me
> before, can anyone point me to some information on solving
> these? I am sure there is some sort of strategy one can follow.

Generally speaking, just making sure that each device has its own IRQ
should generally work. In my case, I have a PCMCIA CDROM at 10, a PCMCIA
NIC at 11, and a PCMCIA modem at 4 (COM1) because I've disabled the
internal modem. The PostScript file 701_TIPS.PS [or its text version,
701_TIPS.TXT] in the "mobiles" section of the IBM PC FTP site has a
section on IRQ usage which you may find helpful.

Regards,

Christian.

-- 
Christian Carey (ccarey_at_CapAccess.ORG) +1 301 431 0053


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:20 EST