Re: 560x v. 600

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Paul Khoury (pkhoury_at_loop.com)
Date: Tue Apr 07 1998 - 22:36:52 EDT

On Mon, 06 Apr 98 22:47:28 -0800, Paul Khoury wrote:

>On Mon, 06 Apr 1998 09:17:11 -0400, richard wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 05 Apr 98 03:13:16 , "Paul Khoury" <pkhoury_at_loop.com> wrote:
>>
>>>If it's that expensive, you might as well consider the 770 if you don't mind the extra
>weigh too
>>>much, unless the 600 is a faster machine.
>>
>>
>>The extra weight is a major factor.
>>
>Depending on who you're talking to. I'm 6'5", so I have a lot of back room
>for my computers. Now, carrying one of my two backpacs is hard.
>
>For me, as long as the machine is under 8 lbs. itself, it's okay.
>(The SPARCbook is also a Magnesium alloy case, making it heavier than
>plastic).
>
>
>Now carrying heavy peripherals is a major setback for me (CD-ROM, etc).
>
>--
>Paul Khoury <pkhoury_at_loop.com> http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
>Sent from my P75 Server running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 6
>There are 27 Processes with 93 Threads.
>This machine's uptime is 3d 9h 42m 38s 335ms.
> 

-- 
Paul Khoury   <pkhoury_at_loop.com>  http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 5
There are 24 Processes with 89 Threads.
This machine's uptime is 0d 1h 21m 54s 695ms.

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:59 EST