Re: 701's History (Was: 560x v. 600)

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Paul Khoury (pkhoury_at_loop.com)
Date: Tue Apr 07 1998 - 22:37:00 EDT


On Mon, 06 Apr 98 22:52:11 -0800, Paul Khoury wrote:

>On Mon, 6 Apr 98 21:56:36 EDT, Robert Dewar wrote:
>
>><< The larger truth above & beyond all of this is IBM simply took too long
>>bringing the 701 on-line into the market. By the time they did, market
>>trends *were* indeed scooting toward the spectrum of features that Robert
>>describes. Another issue is price. Long before the fire sale prices, the
>>701's sold for a *huge* premium--one of the most expensive models. IBM
>>blew it on that one.
>>>>
>>
>>I am typical of the kind of customer IBM is aiming at with high level
>>notebooks (many of the readers of this newsgroup are not :-)
>
>Well, I might consider myself with a higher end notebook, but non-IBM
>(just IBM parts).
>
>BTW, does anyone on this list use a Power ThinkPad running NT or AIX?
>>
>>I found the price of the 701 perfectly reasonable. I would have bought one
>>immediately *if* I could have taken the memory up beyond the totally
>>unacceptable 40meg limit at the time and *if* it had had a Pentium.
>>
>>But now, the form factor is of no interest to me, since a 10.4" screen
>>is simply too small.
>>
>Well, if you're doing graphics work, I can imagine that, but for me, it's huge,
>considering I'm using a 12" CRT anyways (my 14" CRT has a bad cable
>and burn in).
>
>>I find the 560 much more attractive. But as long as I can get more power
>>for more weight, it's worth it to me, which is why I bought my 770.
>>
>I agree. Even though my SPARCbook is 7.5 lbs, with NO battery, it's my most
>powerful machine, and it's very much worth the weight for the power.
>
>>P.S. just came back from trip to London and Paris, how nice to watch DVD
>>movies on my notebook on the plane and train. By the way, contrary to what
>>I had read in the documentation, there is no problem in playing movies
>>in a custom sized non-full-screen window.
>>
>>
>And this was in OS/2?
>
>--
>Paul Khoury <pkhoury_at_loop.com> http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
>Sent from my P75 Server running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 6
>There are 27 Processes with 93 Threads.
>This machine's uptime is 3d 9h 47m 21s 539ms.
>

-- 
Paul Khoury   <pkhoury_at_loop.com>  http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 5
There are 27 Processes with 95 Threads.
This machine's uptime is 0d 1h 22m 7s 843ms.


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:54:00 EST