Re: Ooops...HTML mistake!

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Randal Whittle (rwhittle_at_usa.net)
Date: Thu Jun 04 1998 - 14:59:41 EDT


At 05:44 PM 6/3/98 , Paul Khoury wrote:
>
>>Hopefully soon everyone online will enter the 90's and start using
mailers that
>>can properly handle attachments and HTML. Meanwhile, I entirely agree that
>>posts to lists such as this should be done in generic ASCII. *However*,
this
>>doesn't mean we should heap abuse on people who - for better or worse - have
>>already moved to more modern protocols.
>>
>I think that most of us have moved into the 90's. Just because we don't
like HTML
>attachments, or our mailer can't view it anyways doesn't mean it's
outdated. Many

>I can't see any benefit of viewing a simple message in HTML anyways. It's
like sending
>someone a VHS cassette tape when they can just as easily make a 5 minute
phone call

        No, if everyone was using HTML mail, I could have embedded close-up
pictures of the door hinges and tapered edges I was describing instead of
trying draw them in ASCII.

        Dave's right. The more appropriate analogy would be those who were so
attached to their radios that they wouldn't buy a TV. Once you see how
useful HTML mail can be, you'll wish everyone else had it too.

-------
Randal J. Whittle whittle_at_usc.edu (213) 740-7775
Director, Electronic Commerce Program
Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:54:07 EST