Re: 765D. Is it possible to extend memory beyond the stated max of 104

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Bill Morrow (penzance_at_icanect.net)
Date: Mon Jun 08 1998 - 04:35:50 EDT


HUH..!!

Lilla Slater wrote:

> Jeff, here's where I read of the "special" memory part. Upon rereading, I
> see that the 8MB comes off of the 64MB, not the 32MB. So, your configuration
> does make sense. Clever the way they engineered it so you don't get the full
> use of the 64MB, therefore encouraging you to replace the 16 with a 32.
>

yeah, right..and the Oil Companies have been supressing the water fueled engine
for 50 years..

thre 760E series was not intended to use more than 80megs..
apricorn then fooled IBM and everyone else when they did a 64meg DIMM carrier..
(later redone as a 32meg DIMM carrier)
note that on the original IBM DIMM carrier, 8megs was added to give the base
760ED 16megs..

to get to 104 megs, the 8meg on the original DIMM carrier had to be mapped out
of existance..
there are 4 memory lines on the 760ED..
the syustem board uses one for its 8megs..
the DIMM carrier used another for ITS 8megs..
leaving one each for the DIMM sockets..
its late and i'm not so coherent about this but i was there and i sold those
64meg DIMM carriers..

kingston is full of it..!!!
get Apricorn or Viking or GoldenRam..
mix any of it..
just stick the 64 in the right socket and ANY 64 will work with ANY 32..
(kingston excluded)

geeze..!!!

> http://www.kingston.com/catalog/memory/ibm164.htm
>
> The comments say:
> When installing a 64MB module, half of the non-removable memory (8MB) will
> be disabled.
>
> Although it is physically possible to install more memory, the system will
> only recognize 104MB maximum.
>
> 104MB** (1) KTM760ELD/32
>
> ** Requires replacement of all standard memory where indicated.
>
> Lilla
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jeffj_at_ro.com <jeffj_at_ro.com>
> To: Lilla Slater <lilla_at_gte.net>
> Date: Sunday, June 07, 1998 8:45 PM
> Subject: Re: 765D. Is it possible to extend memory beyond the stated max of
> 104
>
> >"Lilla Slater" <lilla_at_gte.net> said the following on the auspicious date
> >of 98-06-07:
> >
> >>Is there a hardware device which would allow stacked memory ?
> >
> >>Or, something that would allow larger mem chips to be used?
> >
> >>Normal Memory Configuration:
> >>16MB non-removable
> >>16MB in slot 1
> >>64 MB in slot 2
> >>----------
> >>96 MB total
> >
> >Not quite. I have this configuration and it yields 88MB of RAM. The
> >documentation says this is normal.
> >
> >>Note: you can reach 104MB, by replacing slot1 with a "special" 32MB which
> >>will only use 24 of the 32. Kingston sells this "special" 32MB memory
> >>part.
> >
> >>Question: Can you use a place 32MB, or does it have to be the "special"
> >>3MB?
> >
> >I had no idea there was some special memory thingy. I'm already seeing the
> >lack of 8MB of RAM without using any special memory thingy, so my guess is
> >that no special thingy is needed.
> >
> >Does anyone else know if I'm right, or do I just have a peculiar memory
> >setup?
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------
> >Windows95 -- An entomologist's dream
> >
> >Jeff Jackowski http://ro.com/~jeffj/
> > OS/2 WPS (Desktop) Tips, remote i-net dialup
> >"Luncheon meats make the sawdust in your stomach
> > explode." -- Crow T. Robot
> >
> >

--
Happy Trails...   :-)
** Bill Morrow **
WEB PAGE: http://thinkpads.com
DISCUSSION: http://thinkpads.com:8080/webboard/$webb.exe
bill_at_nospam@thinkpads.com, morrow1_at_nospam@compuserve.com
770ED-5AU, 770-1AU(2), 760ED(1), 701C(2), 750C, IBM WorkPad
Win95B & Win98-RC2


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:54:08 EST