Re: Screen Quality

From: Paul Khoury (pkhoury_at_loop.com)
Date: Fri Oct 02 1998 - 03:14:29 EDT

• Next message: Rich_Chong_at_mail.share.org: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Previous message: BirgerPetterson: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Maybe in reply to: H Doan: "Screen Quality"
• Next in thread: Eric Giles: "Re: Screen Quality"

On Sat, 26 Sep 1998 11:23:46 -0700 (PDT), H Doan wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I am new to this list. Just signed on. I just bought myself a ThinkPad
>560E, upgraded it to 80 megs and installed windows NT. Everything
>seems perfect except.... the screen. The contrast is hideously low. I
>did quite a lot of research before I committed to buying this machine.
>I never realize how poor the TFT screen is. Is this typical of ALL the
>thinkpads??

I don't think so. With my 355C, it had a nice LCD, until it died about 1.5
months later (fortunately, I got the 701 from that mishap).

Maybe you have a lemon LCD.

-- 
Paul Khoury |  <pkhoury_at_loop.com> | Sent from my K5-200
http://warped.cswnet.com/~pkhoury/index.html  |  http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org (local machine)
Proudly running OS/2 Warp 3 & 4, Mac OS 7.5.3, Sun Solaris 2.4, Linux 2.0.29,  Newton OS 1.05
ICQ#14582895

• Next message: Rich_Chong_at_mail.share.org: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Previous message: BirgerPetterson: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Maybe in reply to: H Doan: "Screen Quality"
• Next in thread: Eric Giles: "Re: Screen Quality"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:54:25 EST