Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!

From: Rich_Chong_at_mail.share.org
Date: Fri Oct 02 1998 - 02:31:29 EDT

• Next message: Bill Morrow - http://thinkpads.com: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Previous message: Paul Khoury: "Re: Screen Quality"
• Maybe in reply to: Bill Morrow - http://thinkpads.com: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Next in thread: Bill Morrow - http://thinkpads.com: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Reply: Bill Morrow - http://thinkpads.com: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Reply: John H. Kim: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"

It sorta depends on the size of a readme and its direct irrelavance to
thinkpads. Posting opinions or personal high/low-lights of a product is one
thing, but verbatim quoting crosses that grey line... ...Just my opinion,
do what you want.
rich

> > Want me to post the readme file..?? :-)
> > learn about the limitations..

RICH_CHONG; The above is not on their web site. What harm is there to
listing the readme file.

Birger

• Next message: Bill Morrow - http://thinkpads.com: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Previous message: Paul Khoury: "Re: Screen Quality"
• Maybe in reply to: Bill Morrow - http://thinkpads.com: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Next in thread: Bill Morrow - http://thinkpads.com: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Reply: Bill Morrow - http://thinkpads.com: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"
• Reply: John H. Kim: "Re: Partition Magic 4.0--the rest of the story!"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:54:25 EST