Re: 360C BIOS update and (lack of) battery

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Martin Lyngvig (martini_at_acm.org)
Date: Wed Dec 02 1998 - 13:40:55 EST


Well, there is no problems with any of my batteries or the internal power
supply - it all passes the tests in the HMM--so the solution is to replace
the system board (according to HMM). But that is what I want to avoid,
because I can live eith the minor issue of typing the date in at every boot
and just run on wall power.

And, erm, of course the downloaded file creates a bootable floppy...it's
when booting on that floppy and running the program that the error
occurs... ;)

If you do have a system board for the 360C, then I may be interested in
that tho... :)

-Martin

At about 08:43 02-12-98 -0000, peter machule scribbled:
>The Bios Ver 1.4X was designed for Win 95 . Some changes were made in the
>Plug and play protocol among other things.
>So yes, you want Bios ver 1.4x.
>I have spare, one internal DC/DC power supply for a 360x.
>$45 US ??...plus transpo
>This should fix the battery problem .
>The backup power is a bunch of Nicad Cells soldered together underneath the
>floppy bay and usually under a piece of plastic.
> One screw removes the plastic and lets you remove the battery.
>IBM was no unreasonable on the price of this thing ...$7.50 ???
>But first measure the voltage. I'm away from my bible at the moment but
look for
>the tpvol2.pdf wich is the HMMM (hardware maintenace manual )
>It's best found on IBM FTP site .
>ftp://ftp.pc.ibm.com/pub/pccbbs/mobiles/tpvol2.pdf
>I believe it was 3 cells so that should be 3.6 volt (ish).
>
>How do you know that your regular battery is good?
>And how are you charging it if your TP360's DC/DC converter is brocken ?
>
>In regards to you error messages you are doing something wrong (grin).
>The standard IBM Bios upgrade creates a BOOTable floppy . It cares not
about your
>system software. Download it again ?
>Good luck.
>
>..peter..
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Lyngvig <martini_at_acm.org>
>To: THINKPAD_at_cs.utk.edu <THINKPAD_at_cs.utk.edu>
>Date: Wednesday, December 02, 1998 7:26 AM
>Subject: 360C BIOS update and (lack of) battery
>
>
>>CPR for 360...
>>
>>I've got a dusty old 360C which I'd like revive from it's hideout in the
>>bottom of a drawer. It has a problem with the main battery power and backup
>>power, so I have to enter the bios date when booting, and the main battery
>>cannot power it. This is normally not a problem, because I just run it on
>>wall power.
>>
>>Wanting to install Windows 95 on it, I need to upgrade the BIOS to 1.43 (or
>>at least 1.40). The docs say to make sure to have a fully charged battery
>>and have the ThinkPad plugged into the wall...but I'm willing to risk my
>>system by relying only on the wall power (we have very few (if any) power
>>outages here). The solution to the power problems are anyway a new system
>>board.
>
>No they are not. See above
>>
>>When running the Flash BIOS upgrade 1.43 (menu: 2. Update system program),
>>I get some different error messages. The first one is like this:
>>
>>Error
>>The system power management is disabled. The process has been cancelled.
>>Esc=Cancel
>>
>>Looked around on IBM's site. They mentioned something about ensuring that
>>the power.exe is being loaded from the config.sys, so I added it (had just
>>low-level formatted the hd so there is no old stuff lying around). I still
>>get that error sometimes when running the update software, but trying with
>>and without battery in, I sometimes get no errors (but no action in system
>>update except it goes back to the menu), and now I get this one also:
>>
>>Error
>>This process requires a charged battery to avoid an accidental power off
>>during an update. Turn off the computer and install a charged battery in
>>the computer.
>>Esc=Cancel
>>
>>Ironically, my battery is fully charged and in good shape--it is just not
>>seen by the computer. ;)
>>
>>So, my question is quite simple. How to I trick/fool/overcome this so I can
>>update to the BIOS needed to run Windows 95? Any chance that BIOS 1.40-1.42
>>is not asking for this? Where to find the older BIOS files? Or can I run
>>Windows 95 on my BIOS 1.16?
>>
>>Any help i sappreciated.
>>
>>-Martin
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------
>> Martin Lyngvig Singapore martini_at_acm.org
>>------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------
 Martin Lyngvig Singapore martini_at_acm.org
------------------------------------------------------------


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:54:33 EST