From: Bill Morrow (penzance_at_icanect.net)
Date: Sun Apr 25 1999 - 16:32:56 EDT
NO, you are not missing something..
you are the customer IBM aimed that machine at..
even though i don't particularly care for the 560 it IS a nice machine and a
worthy successor to the 701..
it does what it was intended to do and thats it..
personally, i like more flexability and expansion on my thinkpads, but for a
narrow need you don't need more..
> I currently use an old 560 - 133 mhz, 1 gb drive, 40mb ram. I almost never
> use the floppy drive and use a cd-rom only to install software. To me, the
> 570 is a bigger, faster, better version of what I have. I understand why
> those who want a lighter machine or those who use a cdrom with some
> frequency might prefer other models, but the 570 seems to be exactly what I
> Am I missing something?
-- Live Long and Prosper, Happy trails...
** Bill Morrow ** :-) Compuserve Thinkpad Forum Sysop WEB page http://thinkpads.com <-- this domain name is soon to be stolen by IBM Thinkpad User Community: http://thinkpads.com/enter.html bill_at_thinkpads.com, morrow1_at_compuserve.com, morrow_at_treco.net 770Z-8AU, 760ED, 760CD, (5)701C, 560E, 755CE, 750C et al...
Including, but not limited to, Subject to prior sale, Your mileage will vary, Done on a closed road with a professional driver AND Do not try this at home..
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:54:54 EST