From: David Ross (ross_at_math.hawaii.edu)
Date: Tue Aug 03 1999 - 17:06:59 EDT
> NOTE:
> there was no dx2/66 in the 701..
> only dx2/50 and dx2/75
Oops - that's what I meant. Makes my statement even truer:-)
- David R.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:55:13 EST