From: Bill Morrow (penzance_at_icanect.net)
Date: Thu Nov 25 1999 - 23:13:19 EST
<LOL>
and its early still..!
Jane Loyless wrote:
> At 09:32 PM 11/24/99 -0500, STeve Andre' wrote:
>
> >Hmmmm: if the comparison is a 300MHz Celeron vs. a 366MHz PII, then I'd
> >have to say thats a difference. Don't forget that a Celeron is about 11%
> >slower than the equivelant PII, thus making just about a 100MHz difference
> >in clock speeds. Still, stuffing the 240 with as much ram as possible
> >will let Window's internal machinations go more unnoticed and help to
> >hide the speed difference.
> >
>
> Just ignore me tonight - both the TP240s are Celeron chips. It's the
> Armadas that are Celeron and PII. They're allbeginning toruntogetherinmyhead.
>
> Jane
-- Happy trails...** Bill Morrow ** :-) WEB page http://thinkpads.com e-mail: bill_at_thinkpads.com, penzance_at_icanect.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:55:35 EST