From: STeve Andre' (andres_at_msu.edu)
Date: Fri Dec 03 1999 - 16:05:16 EST
I'm not sure why you'd want to.
I have yet to see an end-user reason why 98 should be used over 95, other
than USB support. Call me a cynic, but every person in my department who
has gone to Win98 has had various problems and most have reported that
their systems feel slower. I've heard others report problems between 95a
and B, as well. But overall, I think I prefer Win95--its more stable <cough>
and I wish to hell I could get the drivers for it for my two thinkpads (1451
and 1480).
--STeve Andre'
andres_at_msu.edu
At 02:44 PM 12/3/1999 -0500, Slip wrote:
>Hi,
> Being that I'm going to do a reload anyways, anyone have Win98 running
>on a 760ED? I only have 32mb RAM and I don't know how well a 133Mhz would
>hold up. If not that, what about Win95B? I had some major problems with
>OSR2(95B) which were solved when I replaced it with 95a. Maybe it was just
>my luck...:-) Any comments/suggestions appreciated. RedHat Linux runs very
>nice on this laptop so I definatly plan on replacing that as well.....
>
>Regards,
>-Jamie
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:55:38 EST