Re: Active vs Passive. 701 vs 560

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Dominique Pivard (domi_at_kenavo.fi)
Date: Wed May 03 2000 - 07:14:25 EDT


On Wed, 03 May 2000 at 05:58 AM you, "rudolph wratten"
<cowthief_at_worldnet.att.net>, said:

>I feel that the 701 is a really nicer, but slower, machine than the 560.

If you mean a 701C (ie. with TFT) is better than a 560 with DTSN, I agree
with you. But a 560 with TFT is nicer than a 701C, if only for the higher
resolution and better keyboard (the "butterfly" keyboard is nice to show
off to friends, but the 560's is more usable). Don't get me wrong, I have
both and I still love my 701C ;-)

-Dominique


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:56:03 EST