From: John Small (jtsmall_at_onramp.net)
Date: Sat Aug 26 2000 - 23:55:58 EDT
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 23:39:59 -0500, "James H. E. Maugham" <CaptJHEM_at_waterw.com>
wrote:
> I would suggest that you _seriously_ consider a step backward and load
>W95SR2 in lieu of W98.
OK, I'm mulling it over. Most likely that's what I'll do. Why no speed
improvement? Does Win98 need 128mb or something crazy like that? I found Win95
to run well in 32mb.
Thanks.
-jts <Arlington, TX>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:56:21 EST