From: James H. E. Maugham (CaptJHEM_at_waterw.com)
Date: Sun Aug 27 2000 - 01:28:17 EDT
John Small [mailto:jtsmall_at_onramp.net] wrote:
> OK, I'm mulling it over. Most likely that's what I'll do. Why no speed
> improvement? Does Win98 need 128mb or something crazy like that? I
> found Win95 to run well in 32mb.
IMHO, it's the cache. My 760XL (P166/MMX, 96MB, 5.1GB) with 256KB of pipelined
burst L2 cache just cooks along happily under W98SE with nary a problem. Good
thing, as it's my 79YO Mom's internet browser and email machine in Wilkes Barre,
PA and I HATE that run up the NE Extension to "fix" her machine!
Regards,
James
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:56:21 EST