Re: 760 Series-L2 Cache or not?

From: Jane Loyless (jloyless_at_netbox.com)
Date: Sun Oct 29 2000 - 18:03:37 EST

• Next message: Shawn Lin: "Re: How Does IBM Recondition Batteries?"
• Previous message: scosgt_at_att.net: "RE: 760 Series-L2 Cache or not?"
• In reply to: jbrush_at_aros.net: "760 Series-L2 Cache or not?"
• Next in thread: Paul Khoury: "Re: 760 Series-L2 Cache or not?"

At 02:46 PM 10/29/2000 -0700, jbrush_at_aros.net wrote:

>Any opinions on who is right, and who is fibbing ? :-) I have run an PC
>with the L2 cache disable and it turns a 166Mhz into a 486SX-25 so I don't
>want a machine without the cache.
>

ftp://ftp.pc.ibm.com/pcicrse/psref/ is an invaluable resource for
determining model differences.

>Sure is slow in here lately <g>
>

It is the weekend, you know! My excuse is that I've been out all day
enjoying the fall weather!

• Next message: Shawn Lin: "Re: How Does IBM Recondition Batteries?"
• Previous message: scosgt_at_att.net: "RE: 760 Series-L2 Cache or not?"
• In reply to: jbrush_at_aros.net: "760 Series-L2 Cache or not?"
• Next in thread: Paul Khoury: "Re: 760 Series-L2 Cache or not?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:56:32 EST