Re: [still OT] Real DOS Mode under Win2k ?

From: Allan Ballard (aballard_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: Sat Feb 17 2001 - 18:27:53 EST

• Next message: Steve C.: "Re: buying a 10 ig drive"
• Previous message: Allan Ballard: "Re: [OT] Real DOS Mode under Win2k ?"
• Maybe in reply to: sylme: "Re: [still OT] Real DOS Mode under Win2k ?"
• Next in thread: Steve C.: "Re: [OT] Real DOS Mode under Win2k ?"

Guess so.

And good enough reason to throw a copy
of DOS 6.22 on a drive I am populating with
LINUX, WARP and NT.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Khoury <pkhoury_at_loop.com>
To: Allan Ballard <aballard_at_ix.netcom.com>
Cc: ThinkPad List <thinkpad_at_cs.utk.edu>
Date: Saturday, February 17, 2001 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [still OT] Real DOS Mode under Win2k ?

>On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:28:20 -0500, Allan Ballard wrote:
>
>>Still we keep going back to DOS <sigh>.
>>
>>
>Hey, it's all about compatibility. Personally, I'd love to see the x86
gone, and DOS gone,
>but we all know it'll never happen anytime soon.
>
>
>
>

• Next message: Steve C.: "Re: buying a 10 ig drive"
• Previous message: Allan Ballard: "Re: [OT] Real DOS Mode under Win2k ?"
• Maybe in reply to: sylme: "Re: [still OT] Real DOS Mode under Win2k ?"
• Next in thread: Steve C.: "Re: [OT] Real DOS Mode under Win2k ?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:56:50 EST