Re: 570 vs 600?

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Bill Morrow (penzance_at_gate.net)
Date: Sat Mar 24 2001 - 23:55:35 EST

AND, the 570 is MUCH thinner and lighter than the 600..

Cordially, :-)
Bill Morrow
WEB page http://thinkpads.com
thinkpads.com Open Forum
http://www.afaonline.com:8080/webboard/$webb.exe/~2/login?
or go to thinkpads.com and link from there
E-Mail: bill at thinkpads dot com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Hultquist" <ssh_at_accumedia.com>
To: "Donald MacQueen" <dmacq_at_erols.com>; <THINKPAD_at_cs.utk.edu>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 4:41 PM
Subject: RE: 570 vs 600?

> Exactly. If you expect to use your machine on the road a lot, and you need
to
> have CD-ROM, 2nd battery, etc., the 600 (or T series) is the better
choice,
> since you get more for lighter (than the ultrabay with the 570). If,
however,
> you need only the machine for the most part, you may find the 570 meets
your
> needs very well. It is lighter if you don't carry the ultrabay, and allows
> you to do everything you need except the CD or floppy (with infrared, does
> anyone use a floppy anymore?!?!).
>
> ssh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald MacQueen [mailto:dmacq_at_erols.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 13:24
> To: THINKPAD_at_cs.utk.edu
> Subject: 570 vs 600?
>
>
> what are the main differences between the 600 and 570 lines of
> thinkpads? the only one that jumps out at me is that the 600 has the
> ultrabay for a 2nd hd or floppy or battery or cd-rom, etc., while
> these are in the ultrabase in the 570.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> --
> Donald
>
> Donald M. MacQueen
> Registered Smalltalk Bigot, [Esq.]
>
>
>

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:56:58 EST