Re: Email clients, was Buggs

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Aryeh Goretsky (goretsky_at_adelphia.net)
Date: Wed Oct 09 2002 - 18:56:35 EDT


Hello,

AT&T WorldNet provides an alternate web site for support called
the WorldNet User's Reference Desk at

   <http://www.wurd.com/>

which gives information about how to access services like email
using a variety of clients such as Outlook, Eudora, Netscape Mail
and so forth.

While the site is geared towards supporting AT&T WorldNet customers
there is a lot of general information for configuring applications,
troubleshooting connectivity problems, and so forth.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

At 12:17 PM 10/9/2002 -0400, you wrote:

Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 21:30:16 -0400
From: "Bruce Markowitz" <scosgt_at_worldnet.att.net>
To: <dr.r.becker_at_gmx.net>, <Thinkpad_at_cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: Email clients, was Buggs
Message-Id: <003b01c26f33$6ca28280$9000a8c0_at_dadstoy>

And Pegasus uses that insane encoding, but anyway, I don't know how to set
up my AT&T account with anything but Outlook.
----- Original Message -----
From: <dr.r.becker_at_gmx.net>
To: <Thinkpad_at_cs.utk.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:13 PM
Subject: OT: Re: Email clients, was Buggs

> Bruce,
>
> what do email clients have to do with the method of internet
> connection?
>
> A good email program works with any connection it gets ;-)
>
> I use Pegasus Mail mainly on a LAN, with DSL, ISDN and sometimes when
> I am travelling with normal dial-up. I do not need to change anything
> in the email program. I have to change the Windows settings of
> course.
>
> I use Pegasus for ages (started with the very first version) and the
> thought of using anything else never occurred to me for a moment. And
> I could be considered to be a heavy user, about 1000 emails a day
> (no, I do not need to read all of them) and about 50 different email
> accounts. All easily done with my Pegasus Mail. It's absolutely free,
> by the way. The new version can even be set to emulate the dreadful
> Outlook display of messages, if someone so wishes.
>
> Richard Becker
> London
>
>
> > I am always interested to learn new things. What email client won't
> > work with both dial up and cable?
> >
> > Gary Kuzntiz
> >
> > On 8 Oct 2002 at 17:22, Bruce (Bruce Markowitz
> > <scosgt_at_worldnet.att.net>) commented about Re: Buggs:
> >
> > > OTOH, some of us use our reader BOTH on a direct dialup AND on a
> > > cable connection, and Outlook can be configured to work with BOTH,
> > > others can not. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr. Jeffrey
> > > Race" <jrace_at_attglobal.net> To: <THINKPAD_at_cs.utk.edu> Sent: Tuesday,
> > > October 08, 2002 5:54 AM Subject: Re: Buggs
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 11:59:14 -0700, Gary Kuznitz wrote:
> > > > >I can't for the life of me understand why so many people insist
> > > > >on using Outlook. It is almost the only email client that most
> > > > >viruses are created for. You can't tell me because it's free
> > > > >because other email clients are free also. You can't tell me
> > > > >because it's the best because most people can't find the options
> > > > >they want or need and most people end up sending emails formated
> > > > >when they really didn't intend to.
> > > >
> > > > It's no secret. It's the same reason a lot of people smoke
> > > > (though it's known to be dangerous), don't use seatbelts (though
> > > > it's known to be dangerous), and eat junkfood at Mac (known to be
> > > > unhealthy) allowing their body metrics (Body Mass Index and
> > > > waist/hip ratio) grossly to exceed safe limits. A lot of people
> > > > are lazy layabouts who don't give a damn.
> > > >
> > > > Jeffrey Race
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:59:28 EST