NO
----- Original Message -----
From: "richard" <rpritz@rcn.com>
To: "Rob Bell" <RobDBell@mailworks.org>
Cc: "ThinkPad Mailing List" <thinkpad@stderr.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Thinkpad] x30 v. x31
> Based on 2672-CTO: P M 1.4GHz, 512MB RAM, 60GB HDD, 12.1 XGA(1024x768)
> TFT LCD, Modem(CDC), Ethernet(LOM), Wireless upgradeable, 6 cell Li-Ion
> battery, WinXP Pro
>
> P M 1.3GHz, 256MB RAM, 20GB HDD, 12.1 XGA(1024x768) TFT LCD, Modem(CDC),
> 10/100 Ethernet(LOM), Secure Chip(TCPA), Wi-Fi wireless upgradeable, 6
> cell battery, WinXP Pro
>
> If these are the only relevant specs, 1.4ghz is better than 1.3ghz. Am
> I missing something?
>
> Rob Bell wrote:
>
> > Go to http://www.ibm.com/products/us/ and enter the type code in the
> > search box. You'll get some hits of pages that will have the specs.
> > Then you can compare them with the type you actually ordered.
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > richard wrote:
> >
> >> The internal box has an "IBM security seal," which I'm a bit hesitant
> >> to open for fear I'll have trouble returning.
> >>
> >> The internal box is labeled 2672-w14 (or 2672w14-opy) and another
> >> label is 2672-cto. I can't find either in the current tabook or in
> >> tawbook
> >>
> >> Specs printed on the box appear the same as what I ordered, other
> >> than a faster processor (1.4 v. 1.3), plus some better stuff I'll
> >> replace anyway (a 60gb 4200, better than a 20gb 4200, but not as good
> >> as the 60gb 7200 I ordered).
> >>
> >> If there's otherwise no difference, I'll keep this model.
> >>
> >> ???
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Thinkpad mailing list
> Thinkpad@stderr.org
> http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/thinkpad
_______________________________________________
Thinkpad mailing list
Thinkpad@stderr.org
http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/thinkpad
Received on Wed Aug 25 23:30:00 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 26 2006 - 16:03:24 EDT