On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:31:01PM -1000, David Ross wrote:
> [snip]
> > It is particularly good for LCD screens
> [snip]
> > However, on CRT screens, it is perhaps not as good for some eyes.
> ClearType
> > was an invention of Apple many years ago.
>
> Cleartype is mainly subpixel rendering, which shouldn't have more of an
> effect on a CRT than a good anti-aliasing program.
Anti-aliasing uses color blending. Subpixel rendering uses the spatial
distribution of the color components of a pixel. Not all CRTs use
trinitron like displays. Trying to use subpixel rendering designed for
for vertical stripe pixels isn't going to work well on a shadow mask
display.
> Like some of the others here, I did not like Cleartype on the one Thinkpad
> we have running XP, and turned it off to stop the headaches. However, I do
> like the subpixel-based smoother built into Adobe Reader.
>
> David
-- Most people are immune to facts, logic, and reason. John P. Serafin | Operating a bicycle is more like driving than riding. jps at pobox com | Operating an automobile is more like riding than driving. _______________________________________________ Thinkpad mailing list Thinkpad@stderr.org http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/thinkpadReceived on Fri Nov 16 22:24:51 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 02 2007 - 00:00:13 EST