C'mon, guys, step away from the keyboard, and take a deep breath. No
OS wars, remember? That includes versions of Windows.
Jane
On Nov 25, 2007 10:17 PM, Randy L Santossio <starfirect@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And again, the very first point I made was "it is unrealistic to expect a migratition from one OS to another and have all of your old software work" and I mean that for any OS be it Windows, *nix or OSX.
>
> Having repeated that, there are solutions that can be explored for the old software: launch options, administration launching, and upgrades. Bruce said that he was opting not to upgrade the apps because it might cost a lot of cash and I've got no beef with that. The fact that Vista is more than just XP + Eye Candy is the reason why there's issues and those issues are often not Microsoft's fault;, its often the ISV's fault. Since it's easier to blame the OS, most people do that - and I'm even OK with that but I still maintain that it's an unrealistic expectation that you won't have any problems when you switch OS's... which is why I've recommended to ppl to get Vista with a new PC. And why I suggested the same thing for XP, when it first came out. Easier for all involved.
>
> What I do have an issue with is when someone makes a carefree declaration that is proven to be bunk, like saying there's no difference in functionality between Office XP and Office 2007. I'm sorry, but that's a complete crap comment. Further, the three comments of mine that you're taking out of context were made about his stance on Office 2007 - not Vista.
>
> By the way, in using the "term" M$, you're basically stating the fact that you're biased in one way or another. :)
>
_______________________________________________
Thinkpad mailing list
Thinkpad@stderr.org
http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/thinkpad
Received on Sun Nov 25 22:25:09 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 02 2007 - 00:00:15 EST